Site Under Constructon - Scholarly Certification In Work

Source data

Greek New Testament: Center for New Testament Restoration (CNTR), greekcntr.org · Robinson-Pierpont Byzantine Textform (2018), byzantinetext.com

Latin: Clementine Vulgate (1592, public domain)

Syriac: pinned scrollmapper Peshitta text (public domain); printed exemplar unestablished. English: Murdock 1851.

English glosses: Tyndale House Cambridge STEP Bible (TAGNT) · Whitaker's Words (William Whitaker, public domain) · A Compendious Syriac Dictionary (Jessie Payne Smith, 1903, public domain)

License

Urevangelium is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Source data acquired from the Center for New Testament Restoration is incorporated under its CC BY-SA 4.0 license; this project honors the ShareAlike obligation by releasing all derivative alignment data under the same terms. You are free to share and adapt this work, including for commercial use, provided you give appropriate credit and license your derivative work under the same terms.

© 2026 Urevangelium

Sources, editions, coverage, and editorial status

Urevangelium

ur-eh-van-GAY-lee-um · the original Gospel

The Gospels across their earliest witnesses, and the tradition they carried forward

GospelsPapyriSourcesVaticanusMethodsExceptions
MatthewMarkLukeJohn

Matthew 23:30

Text & API
← Prev Book← Prev Chapter← Prev VerseChapterVerseNext Verse →Next Chapter →Next Book →
Verse integrity report · Scholarly review remains open

Checks run on this verse’s loaded word streams against each tradition’s own pinned source. Differences between traditions are preserved. These checks never change source text or English wording. English placement, cross-source correspondence, and manuscript-image review remain separate.

Per-source verification of matthew 23:30
SourceSource wordingSource orderEnglish wordingEnglish placementEvidence limits
Greek Papyri

Declared CNTR papyrus collection; physical attestation still requires image review

Machine compared

Admitted cells match the CNTR surviving-character projection. This does not establish completeness or agreement with manuscript images.

Review needed

Composite order follows recorded witness coordinates; independent coverage and occurrence-order review is pending.

Review needed

2 stored word glosses; 0 TAGNT glosses of proposed readings marked †; 7 displayed papyrus occurrences have no matching English. Proposed-reading English does not certify missing Greek letters. Independent English-source and semantic review remains pending.

Review needed

Independent source-language placement review is pending. Wording and sequence checks do not certify meaning.

Review needed

Manuscript-image certification is pending; transcription agreement is a separate result.

Sahidic

Sahidica NT 4.1.0 / Coptic SCRIPTORIUM

Machine compared

12 source occurrences match the pinned transcription or edition.

Machine compared

Displayed sequence matches this source’s own sequence.

Review needed

An independent wording check for this column’s declared English authorities is pending.

Review needed

Independent source-language placement review is pending. Wording and sequence checks do not certify meaning.

Review needed

Comparison is against the declared electronic edition; edition acquisition and scholarly review remain separate.

Vaticanus

INTF GA 03, original hand, independent XML extraction

Machine compared

20 source occurrences match the pinned transcription or edition.

Machine compared

Displayed sequence matches this source’s own sequence.

Review needed

An independent wording check for this column’s declared English authorities is pending.

Review needed

Independent source-language placement review is pending. Wording and sequence checks do not certify meaning.

Review needed

Manuscript-image certification is pending; transcription agreement is a separate result.

Sinaiticus

CNTR GA 01, selected base hand, declared glyph projection

Machine compared

20 source occurrences match the pinned transcription or edition.

Machine compared

Displayed sequence matches this source’s own sequence.

Machine compared

Both English views preserve every character and occurrence from Henry Tompkins Anderson, 1918. 0 occurrences await source grouping. This does not certify semantic placement.

Review needed

Independent source-language placement review is pending. Wording and sequence checks do not certify meaning.

Review needed

Manuscript-image certification is pending; transcription agreement is a separate result.

Vulgate

Clementine Vulgate with registered verse-boundary concordance

Machine compared

15 source occurrences match the pinned transcription or edition.

Machine compared

Displayed sequence matches this source’s own sequence.

Machine compared

Both English views preserve every character and occurrence from Douay-Rheims American Edition of 1899 (Challoner tradition). 12 occurrences await source grouping. This does not certify semantic placement.

Review needed

12 English occurrences await source grouping. The published wording is preserved; these occurrences still need an evidence-backed source assignment.

Review needed

Comparison is against the declared electronic edition; edition acquisition and scholarly review remain separate.

Bezae Greek

ITSEE/IGNTP Bezae Greek, first encoded reading; independent XML extraction

Machine compared

20 source occurrences match the pinned transcription or edition.

Machine compared

Displayed sequence matches this source’s own sequence.

Not applicable

This side displays manuscript text; the facing Latin is not an English gloss.

Not applicable

Greek–Latin correspondence requires bilingual review; no English gloss is displayed.

Review needed

Manuscript-image certification is pending; transcription agreement is a separate result.

Bezae Latin

ITSEE/IGNTP Bezae Latin, first encoded reading; independent XML extraction

Machine compared

15 source occurrences match the pinned transcription or edition.

Machine compared

Displayed sequence matches this source’s own sequence.

Not applicable

This side displays manuscript text; the facing Latin is not an English gloss.

Not applicable

Greek–Latin correspondence requires bilingual review; no English gloss is displayed.

Review needed

Manuscript-image certification is pending; transcription agreement is a separate result.

Peshitta

Pinned electronic Peshitta with registered verse-boundary concordance

Machine compared

13 source occurrences match the pinned transcription or edition.

Machine compared

Displayed sequence matches this source’s own sequence.

Machine compared

Both English views preserve every character and occurrence from James Murdock, 1851. 0 occurrences await source grouping. This does not certify semantic placement.

Review needed

Independent source-language placement review is pending. Wording and sequence checks do not certify meaning.

Review needed

Comparison is against the declared electronic edition; edition acquisition and scholarly review remain separate.

Byzantine

Robinson–Pierpont 2018

Machine compared

20 source occurrences match the pinned transcription or edition.

Machine compared

Displayed sequence matches this source’s own sequence.

Review needed

An independent wording check for this column’s declared English authorities is pending.

Review needed

Independent source-language placement review is pending. Wording and sequence checks do not certify meaning.

Review needed

Comparison is against the declared electronic edition; edition acquisition and scholarly review remain separate.

Alignment preview · correspondence review is incomplete.

Hover or focus a word to see its counterparts. Click to keep the highlight; Escape clears it.

Source columns read independently. Gold highlights show recorded correspondences or source form matches. Dashed highlights show existing cross-source alignments still under review. Absent words are never highlighted.

Greek Papyri
Earliest PapyriTAGNTc. 125–250 AD
All displayed words from P77
·ι
—
ημε·α
—
··τερων
—
ημω·
—
·····νοι
—
αυτων
with them
εν
in
τ·
—
·····των
—
Lost or unreadable

These source states are retained separately from correspondence. An absent or lost word cannot be highlighted.

  • Lost or unreadable: 11 recorded positions.

See Comparison rows for their recorded positions.

  • P77: editorial restoration; no readable text recorded for this word. Transcription proposes: εν.
  • P77: editorial restoration; no readable text recorded for this word. Transcription proposes: ταισ.
  • P77: editorial restoration; no readable text recorded for this word. Transcription proposes: ημεραισ.
  • P77: editorial restoration; no readable text recorded for this word. Transcription proposes: των.
  • P77: editorial restoration; no readable text recorded for this word. Transcription proposes: ουκ.
  • P77: editorial restoration; no readable text recorded for this word. Transcription proposes: αν.
  • P77: editorial restoration; no readable text recorded for this word. Transcription proposes: ημεθα.
  • P77: editorial restoration; no readable text recorded for this word. Transcription proposes: αιματι.
  • P77: editorial restoration; no readable text recorded for this word. Transcription proposes: των.
View Automation

The system selects attested words from the registered papyrus transcriptions and retains manuscript attribution and letter-condition symbols. English glosses are matched to the recorded Greek readings.

Full certification rulesRead the English word-order paper
Symbol key
Coptic
SahidicHorner / lexical aidc. 250–300 AD
alignment under review
ⲉⲧⲉⲧⲛϫⲱsay
ⲙⲙⲟⲥour
ϫⲉⲉⲛⲉⲛϣⲟⲟⲡbecome
ⲛⲛⲉϩⲟⲟⲩox
ⲛⲛⲉⲓⲟⲧⲉfather
ⲛⲉⲛⲛⲁϣⲱⲡⲉbecome
ⲁⲛgreat one
ⲛⲙⲙⲁⲩwith
ⲡⲉsg. masc. copula
ⲛⲕⲟⲓⲛⲱⲛⲟⲥpartner
ⲉⲡⲉⲥⲛⲟϥblood
ⲛⲛⲉⲡⲣⲟⲫⲏⲧⲏⲥprophet
View Automation

The system preserves Sahidica’s Coptic word groups and links them to the comparison. English uses admitted Horner passages, dictionary glosses, and marked annotations, according to the evidence available for each word group.

Full certification rulesRead the English word-order paper
Alexandrian
VaticanusCertified Englishc. 175–325 AD
καιand
λεγετεyou say;
ειIf
ημεθαwe were
ενin
ταιςthe
ημεραιςdays
τωνof the
πατερωνfathers
ημωνof us,
ουκnot
ανthen would
ημεθαwe were ourselves being
αυτωνwith them
κοινωνοιpartakers
ενin
τωthe
αιματιblood
τωνof the
προφητωνprophets,
View Automation

The system imports Vaticanus’s original-hand transcription, checks it against a second transcription, and matches Greek words with English using published glosses and lexical evidence. Each displayed word retains its source reference.

Full certification rulesRead the English word-order paper
Latin
VulgateDouay-Rheims 1899c. 382–405 AD
etAnd
dicitissay:
SiIf
fuissemus—
inin
diebusthe days
patrum—
nostrorum—
nonnot
essemus—
socii—
eorumthem
inin
sanguinethe blood
prophetarumof the prophets.

English awaiting alignment

we had been · of our Fathers, we would · have been partakers with

View Automation

The system preserves the Clementine Latin and published Douay–Rheims English. Lexical evidence and sentence context guide the matching of English words and phrases to Latin words; the checks account for each occurrence and preserve the published texts.

Full certification rulesRead the English word-order paper
Western
BezaeGreek · Latinc. 150–400 AD
και
λεγεται
ει
ημεθα
εν
ταις
ημεραις
των
πατερων
ημων
ουκ
αν
ημεθα
αυτων
κοινωνοι
εν
τω
αιματι
των
προφητων
et
dicitis
si
fuissemus
in
diebus
patrum
nostrorum
numquam
essemus
eorum
socii
in
sanguine
prophetarum
View Automation

The system imports the Greek and Latin transcriptions separately and checks every displayed word against its source occurrence. It records their comparison links and keeps physical loss separate from gaps in alignment.

Full certification rulesRead the English word-order paper
Syriac
PeshittaMurdock 1851c. 170–400 AD
ܘܐܡܪܝܢsay:
ܐܢܬܘܢand ye
ܕܐܠܘIf
ܗܘܝܢwe had been
ܒܝܘܡܝthe days
ܐܒܗܝܢof our fathers,
ܠܐnot
ܗܘܝܢwe would
ܗܘܝܢhave been participators
ܠܗܘܢwith them
ܫܘܬܦܐin
ܒܕܡܐin the blood
ܕܢܒܝܐof the prophets.
View Automation

The system preserves the Syriac source and assigns published Murdock English using lexical, grammatical, and contextual evidence. It checks that source words and English occurrences are accounted for and keeps the Syriac reading direction.

Full certification rulesRead the English word-order paper
Byzantine
ByzantineCertified Englishc. 300–500 AD
καὶand
λέγετεyou say;
ΕἰIf
ἦμενwe were
ἐνin
ταῖςthe
ἡμέραιςdays
τῶνof the
πατέρωνfathers
ἡμῶνI/we
οὐκnot
ἂνthen would
ἦμενwe were being
κοινωνοὶpartakers
αὐτῶνit/s/he
ἐνin
τῷthe
αἵματιblood
τῶνof the
προφητῶνprophets,
View Automation

The system imports Robinson–Pierpont 2018 Greek and checks each word’s form and grammar before assigning English. It uses published TAGNT glosses and lexical evidence, marking system-derived glosses in orange.

Full certification rulesRead the English word-order paper
See 65 Earliest PapyriNext Verse Available
Trace Your New Testament Back to the Gospel Sources
100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002025Reformation / printed edition zoomModern translation zoomTradition Origins · 1st – 14th Century ADAlexandrian / proto-Alexandrian streamWestern textual streamBezae witnessesByzantine standard traditionfrom Alexandrian-type Greekc. 252 ADGreek manuscript correctionc. 383 ADGreek Papyric. 125–250 ADSahidic NTc. 300 ADVaticanusc. 325 ADOld Latin / Vetus LatinaLatin revision baseVulgate383 ADBezaec. 400 ADOld Syriac traditionSyriac standardizationPeshittac. 400 ADByzantinec. 500 ADSahidic dominantBohairic NTdominant c. 1000+c. 400–500:major uncials copiedafter 600:minority Greek streamc. 1400s:humanist returnto Greek MSSc. 500–700:Old Latin persistsafter 500: Westernin select witnessesc. 600–1300:Peshitta standard textc. 500–800:Byzantine expandsc. 800–900:minuscule copyingc. 900–1300:majority traditionCarolingianrevision · c. 800 ADParis Biblec. 1220–1230 ADPhiloxenianrevision · 508 ADHarkleanrevision · 616 ADTranslation Genealogy1350 CE to PresentTextus Receptus TraditionCoptic witnessesinform critical editionsWestern witnessesinform variant decisionsWycliffe1382Erasmus1516Tyndale1526Stephanus1550Geneva1560Beza1565Bishops'1568Douay-Rheims1582Clementine1592KJV1611Elzevir1633Challoner1749Westcott-Hort1881Revised Version1881Nestle-Aland1898ASV1901BFBS Peshitta1905RSV1952Good News1966Jerusalem1966NASB1971Stuttgart Vulgate1969NIV1978NKJV1982NRSV1989NLT1996WEB2000ESV2001The Message2002NET2005Robinson-Pierpont2005NABRE2011CSB2017LSB2021Line keyTradition beginningTradition streamFading traditionPre-witness periodTranslation / revisionTextual influenceEdition traditionGutenberg Bibleprinted Vulgate c. 1455ComplutensianNT printed 1514 · pub. 1522