Many physical witnesses
Papyri remain separately identified. Multiple papyri may fill different gaps, but their evidence is never blended into an unnamed manuscript.
The Gospels across their earliest witnesses, and the tradition they carried forward
Greek papyrus witnesses · four Gospels
This column is a governed composite of surviving Gospel papyri, not a reconstruction of an original New Testament and not one continuous manuscript. It shows papyrus text only where papyrus text survives. The red lost dots are part of the evidence and are intentionally retained.
65
registered Gospel papyri
2,132
verses with a coverage record
55,231
source coordinates retained
4,812
fully reconstructed cells moved to loss notes
4,770
partial cells showing only surviving letters
3,779
verses checked against declared transcriptions
Coverage means that a papyrus has material somewhere in a verse; it does not mean every word survives. The word-level system separately determines which letters and tokens are extant.
Papyri remain separately identified. Multiple papyri may fill different gaps, but their evidence is never blended into an unnamed manuscript.
The compact column needs one reading per row. Fully preserved readings are preferred over partial readings. Chronology ranks witnesses within each evidence class; agreeing sigla share the cell and dissenting readings remain recorded.
Where no registered papyrus preserves text, the column remains lost. Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, Byzantine, and later codices are not fallback text.
Governing text
Local P*.txt witnesses determine displayed readings. Their markup distinguishes readable text, damage, missing characters, and editorial supply. CC BY-SA 4.0.
Verification
INTF checks witness identity and difficult conditions, especially leading loss. It does not erase a recorded disagreement.
Alignment aid
They identify likely positions in the shared table. They are not papyrus witnesses and cannot create surviving text or decide between papyrus variants.
Retain each papyrus siglum, date range, coverage, and source identity.
CNTR supplies governing text; INTF checks witness identity and difficult conditions.
Scan surviving tokens forward in their own manuscript order; record transpositions.
Guide witnesses locate shared rows but never supply papyrus wording.
Prefer a complete preserved reading; rank witnesses by date within each evidence class.
Keep readable damage, missing text, and editorial supply distinct.
Admit source-supported tokens and retain unresolved evidence explicitly.
This selects a public display; it does not claim the earliest surviving reading is necessarily the autograph.
Matthew 1:7: unresolved P1 readings
The symbols describe the declared source transcription. Letter markings distinguish readable damage from missing characters. A source-conflict notice identifies a disagreement between transcriptions; it does not resolve which reading the manuscript supports.
Where a verified free image is available, the colored indicator links to it. These markings do not independently certify the physical ink.
The corpus retains every original source coordinate, including editorial reconstructions, while separating surviving text from proposed restorations. Corpus construction and page loading enforce the same word-level admission rule. A build check rejects data that would silently reintroduce supplied words or completed missing letters. These checks verify fidelity to the declared transcriptions; they do not certify that every manuscript image has been inspected.
Admission and alignment are separate. Papyrus attestation determines what appears; neighboring certified source coordinates and the comparative grid determine placement. A different reading normally shares the same row when it occupies the same position in the sentence—the disagreement is the evidence being displayed. Multiple papyrus word-units may share one cell when another tradition expresses the corresponding unit differently. Agreement with Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, Byzantine, or another tradition is never an admission requirement. Separate papyrus-only or transposition rows are reserved for additions, genuinely unavailable comparison positions, and order differences that the shared grid cannot represent honestly. External scholarly review, pinned source revisions, and the separate English audit remain additional certification layers.
The Papyrus Map remains the public data appendix: chronology, coverage dots, Gospel distribution, chapter coverage, transcription status, and fragment records. It answers “what survives where?” This page answers “by what rules does that evidence enter the column?”
Explore all 65 papyriThe column follows the declared CNTR transcription. INTF supplies letters at four positions that CNTR retains. Inspection of the manuscript image has not resolved these differences. The table below records the disagreement; it does not certify which traces survive.
| Occurrence | CNTR display | INTF without supplied letters | Disputed letter |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 · first “begat” | εγεννησεν | εγεννη·εν | Sigma: damaged in CNTR; supplied in INTF. |
| 5 · first Rehoboam | ροβοαμ | ·οβοαμ | Initial rho: retained without a damage mark in CNTR; supplied in INTF. |
| 9 · second “the” | τ·ν | ··ν | Initial tau: damaged in CNTR; supplied in INTF. |
| 14 · third “the” | τον | ·ον | Initial tau: damaged in CNTR; supplied in INTF. |
Both transcriptions supply epsilon and iota in the first Abijah and the final phi in Asaph. The column therefore shows αβ··α and ασα·. The English dagger identifies a proposed complete reading.
Compare the CNTR transcription, INTF transcription, and P1 manuscript images.
Return to Matthew 1:7